1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 916 N.W.2d
  5. 916 N.W.2d 41 (2018)
 

NEUMANN v. ANDERSON

A17-1450.

916 N.W.2d 41 (2018)

Jack C. NEUMANN, et al., Respondents, v. Roxann ANDERSON, Respondent, Kimberly S. Pronschinske, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied July 17, 2018.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel J. Heuel , O'Brien & Wolf, L.L.P., Rochester, Minnesota (for respondents Jack C. Neumann and Sandy M. Neumann).

Roxann Anderson, Altura, Minnesota (pro se respondent).

Joseph J. Cassioppi , Jacob P. Harris , Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Michael A. Murphy , Hammell & Murphy, P.L.L.P., Caledonia, Minnesota (for appellants Kimberly S. Pronschinske and Kim M. Pronschinske).

Considered and decided by Hooten, Presiding Judge; Johnson, Judge; and Kirk, Judge.

OPINION

Three siblings own undivided one-third interests in two parcels of rural property. One sibling commenced this action for a partition. Two court-appointed referees issued a report recommending that both parcels be awarded to one sibling, who has leased both parcels for 14 years, and that she make payments to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases