1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 905 N.W.2d
  5. 905 N.W.2d 513 (2017)
 

DEPOSITORS INS. CO. v. DOLLANSKY

A17-0631.

905 N.W.2d 513 (2017)

DEPOSITORS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Craig DOLLANSKY, Respondent, Julie Dollansky, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Filed December 11, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michelle D. Hurley , Yost & Baill, LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota (for appellant)

Mark K. Hellie , Beth K. Bussian , Regional Legal Staff Counsel, Eden Prairie, Minnesota (for respondents)

Considered and decided by Connolly, Presiding Judge; Ross, Judge; and Schellhas, Judge.

OPINION

Appellant argues that the district court erred by granting summary judgment to respondent, arguing that Minnesota Statutes section 60A.41(a) does not bar its subrogation action because respondent is not an insured under appellant's policy. We affirm.

FACTS

In December 2013, respondent Craig Dollansky...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases