NINETIETH MINNESOTA STATE v. DAYTON

A17-1142.

903 N.W.2d 609 (2017)

The NINETIETH MINNESOTA STATE SENATE, et al., Respondents, v. Mark B. DAYTON, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Minnesota, et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Filed: November 16, 2017.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas A. Kelley , Steven E. Wolter , Kevin M. Magnuson , Brett D. Kelley , Kelley, Wolter & Scott, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota; and David F. Herr , Maslon LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents.

Sam Hanson , Scott G. Knudson , Scott M. Flaherty , Emily M. Peterson , Briggs and Morgan, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for appellants.

Harry N. Niska , Ross & Orenstein LLC, Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Kimberly Reynolds Crockett , Center of the American Experiment, Golden Valley, Minnesota, for amicus curiae Center of the American Experiment.


OPINION

On May 25, 2017, the Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate and the Ninetieth Minnesota State House of Representatives (collectively, the Legislature) each adjourned sine die, ending the special session that began on May 23, 2017. On May 30, 2017, the Governor vetoed line-item appropriations to the Legislature...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases