1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 897 N.W.2d
  5. 897 N.W.2d 842 (2017)
 

RANDALL v. PAUL

A16-1734.

897 N.W.2d 842 (2017)

Bruce RANDALL, et al., Appellants, v. William D. PAUL, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Filed June 19, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas M. Skare , Thos. Skare Law Office, S.C., Cloquet, Minnesota (for appellants).

William D. Paul, William Paul Law Office, Duluth, Minnesota (pro se respondent).

Considered and decided by Rodenberg, Presiding Judge; Jesson, Judge; and Klaphake, Judge.

OPINION

Appellants challenge the district court's grant of summary judgment to respondent on their FDCPA claims, arguing that the district court erred in determining that the FDCPA did not apply when respondent-attorney, who was engaged in the business of debt collection, served appellants with two mechanic's lien statements...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases