1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 890 N.W.2d
  5. 890 N.W.2d 728 (2017)
 

HALL v. STATE

A16-0874.

890 N.W.2d 728 (2017)

Timothy HALL, Jr., et al., Respondents, v. STATE of Minnesota, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Filed January 23, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel C. Hedlund , Daniel E. Gustafson , Joseph C. Bourne , Gustafson Gluek PLLC, Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Vildan A. Teske , Phillip M. Kitzer , Brian T. Rochel , Teske, Micko, Katz, Kitzer & Rochel, PLLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota; and J. Gordon Rudd, Jr. , David Cialkowski , Zimmerman Reed, PLLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Patrick Michenfelder , Throndset Michenfelder, LLC, St. Michael, Minnesota; and Garrett D. Blanchfield , Brant D. Penney , Reinhardt, Wendorf & Blanchfield, St. Paul, Minnesota (attorneys for respondents).

Lori Swanson , Attorney General, Sarah L. Krans , Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota (for appellants).

Considered and decided by Worke, Presiding Judge; Stauber, Judge; and Bratvold, Judge.

OPINION

This certified-question appeal under Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 103.03(i) arises from a constitutional challenge to MUPA. Appellants, the State of Minnesota and its commissioner of commerce, urge us to answer the district court's certified question as to whether MUPA creates an unconstitutional taking in the negative,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases