CURTIS v. CURTIS

No. A14-1841.

887 N.W.2d 249 (2016)

In re the Marriage of Christine J. CURTIS, Appellant, v. Gregory M. CURTIS, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

November 16, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew M. Tatge , Matthew C. Berger , Gislason & Hunter LLP, New Ulm, MN, for appellant.

Roger H. Hippert , Nierengarten & Hippert, Ltd., New Ulm, MN, for respondent.

Michael D. Dittberner , Linder, Dittberner & Bryant, Ltd., David L. Olson , Edina, MN; and Mary Catherine Lauhead , Law Offices of Mary Catherine Lauhead, Saint Paul, MN, for amici curiae Committee of the Minnesota Chapter of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers and Committee of the Family Law Section, Minnesota State Bar Association.


OPINION

This appeal from a marital-dissolution action requires us to determine when, and under what circumstances, a district court may consider the income-earning potential of investment assets equitably distributed to a spouse in deciding whether to award maintenance. The district court declined to award maintenance to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases