No. A15-1886.

Mohrman, Kaardal & Erickson, P. A., f/k/a Mohrman & Kaardal, P. A., Respondent, v. Gene Rechtzigel, Appellant, Gene Rechtzigel as Personal Representative for Estate of Frank H. Rechtzigel and as Trustee of any Trust thereunder, et al., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 22, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William F. Mohrman , James R. Magnuson , Mohrman, Kaardal & Erickson, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondent.

Gene Rechtzigel, Apple Valley, Minnesota, pro se appellant.

Considered and decided by Jesson, Presiding Judge; Halbrooks, Judge; and Hooten, Judge.


This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).

Pro se appellant challenges the district court's final contempt order arising out of appellant's failure to comply with post-judgment discovery requests. We affirm....

Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases