STAND UP MULTIPOSITIONAL ADVANTAGE MRI, P.A., Respondent,
v.
AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE COMPANY, a Wisconsin corporation, Appellant,
Michael Schultz, et al., Respondents,
Ilya Knyazev, et al., Respondents,
Thomas Bennerotte, et al., Respondents,
Jed Benjamin Iverson, Respondent,
Gabriel Johnson, Respondent,
Michael Fay, et al., Respondents,
Brad Ratgen, et al., Respondents,
Landon Barakow, Respondent,
Lebertha Porter, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 25, 2016.
April 25, 2016.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Randall D.B. Tigue , Randall Tigue Law Office, P.A., Golden Valley, MN, for respondent Stand Up Multipositional Advantage MRI, P.A.
Michael Schultz, Sommerer & Schultz, Minneapolis, MN, attorney pro se and for Teri Baker.
Ilya Knyazev, Instant Legal Assistance, L.L.C., Minneapolis, MN, attorney pro se and for Vincent Tillotson and Leila Said.
Thomas Bennerotte, Bennerotte & Associates, P.A., Eagan, MN, attorney pro se and for Tiffani Mazzie.
Jed Benjamin Iverson, Law Office of Jed Benjamin Iverson, St. Paul, MN, attorney pro se.
Gabriel Johnson, Thibodeau Johnson & Feriancek, PLLP, Duluth, MN, attorney pro se.
Michael Fay, Minneapolis, MN, attorney pro se and for Yusuf Osman.
Brad Ratgen, Ratgen Personal Injury Law Firm, St. Paul, MN, attorney pro se and for Prisly Arredondo Cerna.
Landon Barakow, St. Paul, MN, pro se respondent.
Lebertha Porter, Minneapolis, MN, pro se respondent.
Jennifer E. Olson , TSR Injury Law, Bloomington, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Association for Justice.
Michael J. Weber , Weber & Nelson Law Office, PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, for amici curiae Center for Diagnostic Imaging, Minnesota Chiropractic Association, Minnesota Ambulatory Surgery Center Association, Twin Cities Orthopedics, Minnesota Medical Group Management Association.
Considered and decided by WORKE, Presiding Judge; JOHNSON, Judge; and HOOTEN, Judge.
OPINION
JOHNSON, Judge.
This appeal presents the question whether an assignment of a no-fault insurance claim to a medical provider is valid and enforceable if the applicable insurance policy states that assignments are forbidden. Applying the caselaw concerning anti-assignment provisions in insurance policies and the plain language of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
