MESERB v. MINN. POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY

No. A14-1694.

870 N.W.2d 97 (2015)

MINNESOTA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ECONOMIC REVIEW BOARD, et al., Petitioners, v. MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 10, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven Nyhus , Flaherty & Hood, P.A., St. Paul, MN; and John C. Hall (pro hac vice), Hall & Associates, Washington, D.C., for petitioners.

Lori Swanson , Attorney General, Max Kieley , Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, for respondent.

Loyd W. Grooms , LWG, P.A., St. Paul, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Chamber of Commerce.

Paige Stradley , Michael Erbele , Merchant & Gould, P.C., Minneapolis, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Center of Environmental Advocacy, et al.

Considered and decided by STAUBER, Presiding Judge; SCHELLHAS, Judge; and BJORKMAN, Judge.


OPINION

In this declaratory-judgment action, petitioners challenge the validity of certain water-quality standard rules promulgated by respondent Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (the MPCA), arguing that the agency failed to comply with statutory rulemaking procedures. We declare the rules valid.

FACTS

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases