1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 863 N.W.2d
  5. 863 N.W.2d 437 (2015)
 

APITZ v. HOPKINS

No. A14-1166.

863 N.W.2d 437 (2015)

Jeffrey APITZ, et al., Appellants, v. Terry HOPKINS, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 18, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew H. Hanka , Fryberger, Buchanan, Smith & Frederick, P.A., Duluth, MN, for appellants.

Brian C. Bengtson , Lano, O'Toole & Bengtson, Ltd., Grand Rapids, MN, for respondents.

Considered and decided by WORKE, Presiding Judge; PETERSON, Judge; and CONNOLLY, Judge.

OPINION

This appeal is from a summary judgment granted to respondent-owners of a dominant estate in a declaratory judgment action brought by appellant-owners of the servient estate to determine the scope of an "exclusive easement for ingress, egress and utility purposes." Because the language granting the easement is ambiguous...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases