1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 863 N.W.2d
  5. 863 N.W.2d 404 (2015)
 

ANGELES v. MEDTRONIC, INC.

Nos. A14-1149, A14-1150, A14-1151, A14-1152, A14-1153, A14-1154.

863 N.W.2d 404 (2015)

Paul V. ANGELES, et al., Appellants, Charlene Mead, et al., Appellants, Charles Starovasnik, Jr., Appellant, Trudy Marse, et al., Appellants, Rebecca Manuel, et al., Appellants, Claude Davenport, et al., Appellants, v. MEDTRONIC, INC., et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 20, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stuart L. Goldenberg , Marlene J. Goldenberg , Goldenberglaw, PLLC, Minneapolis, MN; and Louis M. Bograd , (pro hac vice), Center for Constitutional Litigation, P.C., Washington, D.C.; and Wilbur W. Fluegel , Fluegel Law Office, Minneapolis, MN, for appellants.

Michael T. Nilan , Andrew J. Sveen , Nilan Johnson Lewis, P.A., Minneapolis, MN; and Andrew E. Tauber (pro hac vice), Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, D.C., for respondents.

Considered and decided by PETERSON, Presiding Judge; WORKE, Judge; and CONNOLLY, Judge.

OPINION

In these consolidated appeals, appellants challenge the dismissal of their claims arising out of respondents' advertising and promotion of a medical device that was used and allegedly caused injury to appellants during spinal surgeries. Appellants argue that the district court erred by (1) dismissing as expressly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases