OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
Appellant State of Minnesota challenges the granting of respondent's motion to suppress the evidence obtained from a blood sample taken from him without a warrant. Because we conclude that the exigent-circumstances exception to the warrant requirement applies to the facts of this case, we reverse the grant of the motion to suppress and remand to the district court for trial.
FACTS
At...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.