SHARISS v. CITY OF BLOOMINGTON

No. A13-2293.

852 N.W.2d 278 (2014)

Juan Edward SHARISS, Respondent, v. CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 18, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Juan E. Shariss, Minneapolis, MN, pro se respondent.

Daniel P. Kurtz , League of Minnesota Cities, St. Paul, MN, for appellants.

Considered and decided by REYES, Presiding Judge; HOOTEN, Judge; and KIRK, Judge.


OPINION

REYES, Judge.

In this interlocutory appeal from the district court's denial of appellants' motion for summary judgment, appellants argue that common-law official immunity bars respondent's negligence action against appellant snowplow driver because his decision to drive his snowplow in reverse was a discretionary act that was not willful or malicious and that, as a result, appellant city is entitled to vicarious official immunity. We affirm.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases