STATE v. ROHAN

No. A12-2256.

834 N.W.2d 223 (2013)

STATE of Minnesota, Appellant, v. Stacy Marie ROHAN, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

July 22, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lori Swanson , Minnesota Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Samuel J. Edmunds , Alina Schwartz , Campbell Knutson, P.A., Eagan, MN, for appellant.

Lynne Torgerson , Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.

Considered and decided by STONEBURNER, Presiding Judge; JOHNSON, Chief Judge; and WILLIS, Judge.


OPINION

WILLIS, Judge.*

In this pretrial appeal, the state argues that the district court erred by finding respondent's right to substantive due process requires that an intent requirement be read into Minn.Stat. § 340A.503, subd. 2(1). Because section 340A.503, subdivision 2(1), creates a strict-liability offense and does not violate due-process rights, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

On November 14, 2011...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases