LEIENDECKER v. ASIAN WOMEN UNITED OF MINN.

Nos. A12-1978, A12-2015.

834 N.W.2d 741 (2013)

Lawrence LEIENDECKER, et al., Respondents/Cross-Appellants, v. ASIAN WOMEN UNITED OF MINNESOTA, et al., Appellants/Cross-Respondents (A12-1978), Greenstein, Mabley & Wall, L.L.C., et al., Cross-Respondents, Ruvelson & Kautzer, Ltd., et al., Cross-Respondents, Maria Gloria Fressia, et al., Appellants/Cross-Respondents (A12-2015), Susan L. Triplett, Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 3, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Gunther , Virnig & Gunther, PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, for respondents/cross-appellants Lawrence and Sinuon Leiendecker.

Kay Nord Hunt , Phillip A. Cole , Bryan R. Feldhaus , Lommen, Abdo, Cole, King & Stageberg, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for appellants/cross-respondents Asian Women United of Minnesota, Melani Suarez, and Claudia R. Stahl.

Thomas P. Kane , Nadia B. Hasan , Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for cross-respondents Greenstein, Mabley & Wall, L.L.C. and Frank T. Mabley.

Bryon G. Ascheman , Corinne Ivanca , Burke & Thomas, PLLP, Arden Hills, MN, for cross-respondents Ruvelson & Kautzer, Ltd. and Edward F. Kautzer.

Patrick J. Sauter , Rachel B. Peterson , Bassford Remele, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for appellants/cross-respondents Maria Gloria Fressia, Suzanne M. Cook, Valerie F. Wurster, Kristine M. Arneson, Hong-Ngoc (Ruby) H.N. Nguyen, Naweichi Temu, Regina M. Chu, Saran B. Crayton, Quoc-Bao Doan Do, and Sushila R. Shah.

Louise A. Behrendt , Stich, Angell, Kreidler, Dodge & Unke, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, Georgeanna M.H. Ihrke , Eden Prairie , MN, for cross-respondent Susan Triplett.

Considered and decided by CONNOLLY, Presiding Judge; ROSS, Judge; and STAUBER, Judge.


OPINION

CONNOLLY, Judge.

Appellants jointly challenge the district court's denial of their motions to dismiss respondents' complaint pursuant to Minnesota's anti-SLAPP statute, arguing that the district court misapplied the statute. By notice of related appeal, respondents also challenge the district court's application of the anti-SLAPP statute, arguing that the statute was not properly invoked. In addition, respondents argue that the district court erred...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases