1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 833 N.W.2d
  5. 833 N.W.2d 403 (2013)
 

GRAPHIC COMM'NS v. CVS CAREMARK CORP.

No. A12-1555.

833 N.W.2d 403 (2013)

GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS LOCAL 1B HEALTH & WELFARE FUND "A", et al., Appellants, v. CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION, et al., Respondents, Coborn's Incorporated, Respondent, Kmart Holding Corporation, et al., Respondents, Snyder's Drug Stores (2009), Inc., et al., Respondents, Target Corporation, Respondent, Walgreen Co., Respondent, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 6, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Hashmall , Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon & Vogt, P.A., Minneapolis, MN; and Perrin Rynders (pro hac vice), Varnum LLP, Grand Rapids, MI, for appellants.

Wendy J. Wildung , Craig S. Coleman , Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent Target Corporation.

Todd A. Noteboom , Elizabeth Wiet Reutter , Leonard, Street and Deinard, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent Walgreen Co.

Lewis A. Remele, Jr. , Christopher R. Morris , Bassford Remele, P.A., Minneapolis, MN; and Robert H. Griffith (of counsel) (pro hac vice), Foley & Lardner LLP, Chicago, IL, for respondents CVS Caremark Corporation, et al.

James K. Langdon , Dorsey & Whitney, Minneapolis, MN, for respondents Snyder's Drug Stores (2009), Inc., et al.

Kevin D. Hofman , Ronald B. Peterson , Halleland Habicht P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent Coborn's Incorporated.

Tracy J. Van Steenburgh , Nilan Johnson Lewis, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondents Kmart Holding Corporation, et al.

David R. Marshall , Joseph J. Cassioppi , Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Considered and decided by WORKE, Presiding Judge; KALITOWSKI, Judge; and SCHELLHAS, Judge.

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

In this action, appellants — a group of union-sponsored health-benefit plans — challenge the district court's Minn. R. Civ. P. 12 dismissal of their claims against respondent pharmacies, arguing that the district court erred by concluding that (1) Minn.Stat. § 151.21, subd. 4 (2012), does not create a private right of action, and (2) appellants failed to adequately plead a claim under the Minnesota Prevention...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases