STATE v. SETINICH

No. A11-2303.

822 N.W.2d 9 (2012)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Mark Wesley SETINICH, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

October 22, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lori Swanson , Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and John J. Muhar , Itasca County Attorney, David S. Schmit , Assistant County Attorney, Grand Rapids, MN, for respondent.

Robert E. Mathias , Mathias Law Firm, Duluth, MN, for appellant.

Considered and decided by CONNOLLY, Presiding Judge; STONEBURNER, Judge; and ROSS, Judge.


OPINION

CONNOLLY, Judge.

On appeal from his conviction of fifth-degree possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia, appellant argues that the district court erred in concluding that a state trooper had a reasonable, articulable suspicion to conduct an investigatory stop of his vehicle because the trooper did not have any reasonable suspicion of criminal activity at the time that he ran a check of appellant's license plate. Because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases