KASTNING v. STATE FARM INS. COMPANIES

No. A12-0584.

821 N.W.2d 621 (2012)

Bruce KASTNING, et al., Appellants, v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANIES, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

September 24, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jason D. Pederson , Fuller, Wallner, Cayko & Pederson, Ltd., Bemidji, MN, for appellants.

Gregory E. Kuderer , Fairmont, Minnesota; and Kay N. Hunt , Lommen Abdo Cole King Stageberg PA, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.

Considered and decided by WORKE, Presiding Judge; HOOTEN, Judge; and COLLINS, Judge.


OPINION

HOOTEN, Judge.

Appellants challenge the district court's summary-judgment dismissal of their claim for uninsured motorist coverage under a policy issued by respondent, arguing that the farm tractor with which they collided was an uninsured "motor vehicle" within the meaning of their policy and, alternatively, that they are entitled to coverage under the reasonable-expectations doctrine. We affirm.

FACTS

On July 2, 2010, appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases