Gregory CURTIS, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Respondents,
v.
ALTRIA GROUP, INC., Respondent,
Philip Morris, Inc., Appellant.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Scott A. Smith , Nilan Johnson Lewis PA, Minneapolis, MN; John H. Beisner , Jessica Davidson Miller , Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Washington, D.C.; Robin S. Conrad , National Chamber Litigation Center, Inc., Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America.
Bruce Jones , Faegre & Benson LLP, Minneapolis, MN; Hugh F. Young, Jr. , Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc., Reston, VA, for amicus curiae Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc.
Charles A. Bird , Bird, Jacobsen & Stevens, P.C., Rochester, MN; Gary L. Wilson , Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Association for Justice.
Respondents Gregory Curtis, et al., bring this action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated against appellant Philip Morris, Inc.,1 and its parent company, Altria Group, Inc.,2 alleging that Philip Morris's use of the words "light" and "lowered tar and nicotine" to market and sell cigarettes was false and deceptive, and violated Minnesota's consumer protection...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.