ELLINGSON v. COM'R OF PUBLIC SAFETY

No. A10-1913.

800 N.W.2d 805 (2011)

Kim Marie ELLINGSON, petitioner, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 27, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel A. McCloud , Carson J. Heefner , McCloud & Heefner, P.A., Lindstrom, MN, for appellant.

Lori Swanson , Attorney General, Melissa Eberhart , Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, for respondent.

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, Presiding Judge; HUDSON, Judge; and COLLINS, Judge.


OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appellant Kim Marie Ellingson challenges the district court's order sustaining the revocation of her driving privileges under the implied-consent law, arguing that the exigent-circumstances exception does not apply to the warrantless collection of her urine sample.

FACTS

Respondent Commissioner of Public Safety revoked appellant Kim Marie Ellingson's driving privileges after appellant was arrested for driving...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases