1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 793 N.W.2d
  5. 793 N.W.2d 437 (2010)
 

SODERBECK v. CENTER FOR DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING

No. A10-674.

793 N.W.2d 437 (2010)

Keith SODERBECK, Respondent, v. CENTER FOR DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING, INC., Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 21, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Owen L. Sorenson , Meghan A. Cooper , Stringer & Rohleder, St. Paul, MN, for respondent.

Robert Mahoney , Geraghty, O'Loughlin & Kenney, P.A., St. Paul, MN, for appellant.

Considered and decided by HUDSON, Presiding Judge; WRIGHT, Judge; and ROSS, Judge.

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

Appellant medical diagnostic company challenges the district court's judgment in favor of respondent awarding interest on a personal-injury settlement of respondent's medical-malpractice action. Because the settlement agreement does not provide for interest and respondent repudiated the settlement agreement, we conclude that the settlement amount did not become due or ascertainable and thus appellant is not liable for interest on the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases