1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 788 N.W.2d
  5. 788 N.W.2d 710 (2010)
 

STATE v. CAO

No. A08-1932.

788 N.W.2d 710 (2010)

STATE of Minnesota, Appellant, v. Kasey Vo CAO, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

September 16, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lori Swanson , Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Robert M.A. Johnson , Anoka County Attorney, Kathryn M. Timm , Assistant County Attorney, Anoka, MN, for appellant.

Charles F. Clippert , Caplan Law Firm, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.

OPINION

MEYER, Justice.

Respondent Kasey Vo Cao was found guilty of third-and fourth-degree criminal sexual conduct, in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 609.344, subd. 1(d), and 609.345, subd. 1(d) (2008). During the State's closing argument, the prosecutor stated that Minnesota law did not require corroboration of the complainant's testimony for the jury to find Cao guilty of criminal sexual conduct. The court of appeals held that this statement was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases