BD. OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS v. CICH

No. A10-354.

788 N.W.2d 515 (2010)

MINNESOTA BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS, Respondent, v. Curtis L. CICH, D.C., et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

September 14, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lori Swanson , Attorney General, Jan M. Haapala , Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, for respondent.

William L. Davidson , Thomas D. Jensen , Peter L. Gregory , Lind, Jensen, Sullivan & Peterson, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for appellants.

Considered and decided by HALBROOKS, Presiding Judge; STONEBURNER, Judge; and STAUBER, Judge.


OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Appellants Curtis L. Cich, D.C., and Cich Chiropractic, P.A., challenge the district court's grant of summary judgment to respondent Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners (the board). Because we conclude that the district court erred by enjoining Cich from the practice of chiropractic for a period of time beyond the board's original suspension order, we reverse in part. But because we conclude that the district court properly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases