1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 789 N.W.2d
  5. 789 N.W.2d 860 (2010)
 

MOORHEAD ECONOMIC DEV'T AUTHORITY v. ANDA

No. A07-1918, A07-1930.

789 N.W.2d 860 (2010)

Moorhead Economic Development Authority, Respondent, v. Roger W. Anda, et al., Appellants, Kjos Investments, Respondent Below.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Rehearing Denied November 12, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Shockley , Ohnstad Twichell , P.C., West Fargo, ND, for respondent.

Roger J. Minch , Serkland Law Firm , Fargo, ND, for appellant.

Susan L. Naughton , League of Minnesota Cities, St. Paul, MN, for amicus curiae, League of Minnesota Cities.

Bradley J. Gunn , Howard A. Roston , Malkerson Gilliland Martin LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for amici curiae, Howard A. Roston and Bradley J. Gunn .

OPINION

ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice.

In March 2001 the Moorhead Economic Development Authority (MEDA) exercised its condemnation power to take Roger W. Anda's commercial property as part of a redevelopment project. The project area included Anda's property and more than 20 other nearby properties. After taking title to and possession of Anda's property through a quick-take procedure, MEDA and the property's developer, Moorhead Holiday Associates (MHA), discovered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases