1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 787 N.W.2d
  5. 787 N.W.2d 192 (2010)
 

SYKES v. CITY OF ROCHESTER

Nos. A09-1696, A09-1697.

787 N.W.2d 192 (2010)

Michele SYKES, Appellant, v. CITY OF ROCHESTER, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 3, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michele Sykes, Rochester, MN, pro se appellant.

Pamela L. VanderWiel, Daniel P. Kurtz, Eagan, MN, for respondent.

Considered and decided by SCHELLHAS, Presiding Judge; STONEBURNER, Judge; and CONNOLLY, Judge.

OPINION

SCHELLHAS, Judge.

These consolidated appeals arise out of the district court's dismissals of pro se appellant's special-assessment appeals as untimely. Appellant challenges the dismissals on the bases that respondent did not properly notify her of the special-assessment hearings before the city council, and that she timely served and filed her appeals in the district court. Because we conclude that respondent did not provide appellant proper notice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases