1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 784 N.W.2d
  5. 784 N.W.2d 90 (2010)
 

OPHEIM v. COUNTY OF NORMAN

No. A09-1064.

784 N.W.2d 90 (2010)

Thomas A. OPHEIM, Norman County Attorney, Respondent, v. COUNTY OF NORMAN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

July 6, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael D. McNair, McNair, Larson & Carlson, Ltd., Fargo, ND, for respondent.

Scott T. Anderson, Matthew J. Bialick, Ratwick, Roszak & Maloney, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.

Considered and decided by KLAPHAKE, Presiding Judge; MINGE, Judge; and MUEHLBERG, Judge.

OPINION

MUEHLBERG, Judge.*

Appellant county challenges the district court's determination that the county board acted arbitrarily, capriciously, and unreasonably in setting the 2008 budget of the office of respondent county attorney. Because the district court did not err by concluding that the county board improperly set the budget: (a) without fixing the salary of an assistant county attorney, as required by Minn.Stat. §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases