CANNON v. MINNEAPOLIS POLICE DEPT.

No. A09-1154.

783 N.W.2d 182 (2010)

James F. CANNON, Respondent, v. MINNEAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT, Relator, City of Minneapolis, Commission on Civil Rights, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 1, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Shulman, Law Office of David L. Shulman PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent James F. Cannon.

Susan L. Segal, Minneapolis City Attorney, Timothy S. Skarda, Assistant City Attorney, Minneapolis, MN, for relator.

Considered and decided by LANSING, Presiding Judge; HALBROOKS, Judge; and CONNOLLY, Judge.


OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Relator Minneapolis Police Department (the department) brings this certiorari appeal from a determination by respondent Minnesota Commission on Civil Rights (the commission) that the department engaged in reprisal discrimination. The department challenges the final determination on five grounds: (1) the record does not contain substantial evidence to support the commission's decision on the issue of reprisal; (2) the commission...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases