1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. GRAZZINI-RUCKI v. GRAZZINI
 

GRAZZINI-RUCKI v. GRAZZINI

Nos. A09-0694, A09-0700, A09-1693

Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, Appellant (A09-694, A09-1693), Respondent (A09-700), v. Thomas A. Grazzini, et al., Respondents, Joseph M. Grazzini, et al, Respondents, Ann M. Grazzini-Dunne, Respondent, GFP Co., Respondent (A09-694, A09-1693), Appellant (A09-700), Jefry D. Flemmer, et al., Respondents, John C. Levy, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Filed April 6, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark G. Ohnstad, Thomsen & Nybeck, Bloomington, Minnesota, for appellant Sandra Grazzini-Rucki.

R. Daniel Rasmus, Rasmus Law Office, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for appellant GFP Co..

John M. Harvey, Harvey & Sheehan, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents Thomas Grazzini, Claire Tucker, Susan Grazzini, Christine Grazzini Bye.

Ronald L. Snelling, Banner, Wyoming, for respondents Joseph Grazzini, Mary Erickson, Nancy Grazzini-Olson.

Michael R. Cunningham, Joy R. Anderson, Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondent Ann Grazzini-Dunne.

Douglas R. Peterson, Wade S. Davis, Leonard, Street & Deinard, Mankato, Minnesota; and William L. Greene, Leonard, Street & Deinard, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents Jefry Flemmer, RSM McGladrey Inc..

Kelly A. Putney, Robin Ann Williams, Charles E. Lundberg, Bassford Remele, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents John Levy, Parsinen, Kaplan, Rosberg & Gotlieb.

Considered and decided by Wright, Presiding Judge; Larkin, Judge; and Crippen, Judge.

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

WRIGHT, Judge.

In this appeal arising from a partnership dispute, appellants challenge the district court's dismissal of claims against respondents, arguing that the district court erred by (1) concluding that certain respondents were not partners and, therefore, did not owe partner-based fiduciary duties; (2) relying only on appellants' complaints in granting summary judgment; and (3) dismissing unjust-enrichment claims against certain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases