GOODMAN v. BEST BUY, INC.

No. A07-1820.

777 N.W.2d 755 (2010)

Jonathon GOODMAN, Respondent, v. BEST BUY, INC., Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

February 4, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Katherine L. MacKinnon, Law Office of Katherine MacKinnon, St. Louis Park, MN, for respondent.

Joseph G. Schmitt, Halleland Lewis Nilan & Johnson, Charles E. Lundberg, David A. Turner, Bassford Remele, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, Shalanda D. Ballard, Best Buy, Inc., Richfield, MN, for appellant.

Melissa M. Weldon, Stephen P. Laitinen, Larson King, LLP, St. Paul, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Defense Lawyers Association.

Justin D. Cummins, Miller O'Brien Cummins, PLLP, Minneapolis, MN, for amicus curiae National Employment Lawyers Association, Minnesota Chapter.


OPINION

ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.

The issue here is the interpretation of the tolling provision in 28 U.S.C. § 1367(d) (2006), and specifically, the meaning of the words "shall be tolled."

Respondent Jonathon Goodman brought an action against appellant Best Buy in state court asserting claims under the Federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-54 (2006), and the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), Minn.Stat....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases