1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 776 N.W.2d
  5. 776 N.W.2d 485 (2009)
 

FREEMAN v. SWIFT

No. A09-598.

776 N.W.2d 485 (2009)

Peter FREEMAN, et al., Respondents, v. Janette J. SWIFT, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 29, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Victor Lund, Mark J. Manderfeld, Mahoney, Dougherty and Mahoney, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondents.

Marshall H. Tanick, Stephen H. Parsons, Mansfield, Tanick & Cohen, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.

Considered and decided by LANSING, Presiding Judge; STONEBURNER, Judge; and JOHNSON, Judge.

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge.

Appellant moved to dismiss respondents' defamation action, alleging that the challenged communications are immune from liability under Minn.Stat. § 554.03 (2008). The district court, after reviewing the content of the communications, denied the motion, holding that, because the communications were not directed to "the appropriate government bodies" and were "intentionally aimed at audiences having no connection with the public...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases