1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 793 N.W.2d
  5. 793 N.W.2d 128 (2009)
 

PAULOWNIA PLANTATIONS v. RAJAMANNAN

No. A07-2199.

793 N.W.2d 128 (2009)

PAULOWNIA PLANTATIONS DE PANAMA CORPORATION, Respondent, v. Ambrose Harry RAJAMANNAN, et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

November 5, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William F. Mohrman , Erick G. Kaardal , Mohrman & Kaardal, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.

Gary Hansen , Aaron Mills Scott , Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for appellants.

OPINION

MEYER, Justice.

Paulownia Plantations de Panama Corporation (PPP) invested in appellant Ambrose Harry Rajamannan's plan to commercially grow trees in Panama. After the tree plantations failed, PPP brought suit in Minnesota, where Rajamannan resides and where PPP wired the majority of its investment money. The district court issued a forum non conveniens dismissal on the condition that Panama would accept jurisdiction of the case. The court of appeals...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases