1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 771 N.W.2d
  5. 771 N.W.2d 890 (2009)
 

FISCHER SAND & AGGREGATE v. CTY. OF DAKOTA

No. A09-0295.

771 N.W.2d 890 (2009)

FISCHER SAND & AGGREGATE, INC., Appellant, v. COUNTY OF DAKOTA, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

September 8, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald S. Duffy, Steven J. Weintraut, Melanie J. Triplett, Siegel, Brill, Greupner, Duffy & Foster, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.

James C. Backstrom, Dakota County Attorney, Michael R. Ring, Assistant County Attorney, Hastings, MN, for respondent.

Considered and decided by WORKE, Presiding Judge; HUDSON, Judge; and JOHNSON, Judge.

OPINION

WORKE, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court's conclusion that the status of appellant's land as an agricultural preserve expires eight years after the relevant authority is notified. Appellant argues that, under Minn.Stat. § 473H.08 (2008), agricultural-preserve status expires eight years after the form provided by the Commissioner of Agriculture was filled out by the landowner. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Fischer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases