1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 767 N.W.2d
  5. 767 N.W.2d 711 (2009)
 

HEMMINGSEN v. HEMMINGSEN

No. A08-1136.

767 N.W.2d 711 (2009)

In re the Marriage of Daniel E. HEMMINGSEN, petitioner, Appellant, v. Claudia J. HEMMINGSEN, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

July 7, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce K. Piotrowski, George F. Restovich & Associates, Rochester, MN, for appellant.

Steven C. Youngquist, Youngquist Law Office, Rochester, MN, for respondent.

Considered and decided by ROSS, Presiding Judge; SCHELLHAS, Judge; and WILLIS, Judge.

OPINION

SCHELLHAS, Judge.

Appellant argues that the district court abused its discretion by (1) denying his motion to terminate his spousal-maintenance obligation, (2) denying his motion for amended findings, and (3) granting respondent need-based and conduct-based attorney fees. Because the district court did not make adequate findings to support its order regarding modification of spousal maintenance and attorney fees, we remand for additional findings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases