ROSE v. ROSE

No. A08-1063.

765 N.W.2d 142 (2009)

In re the Marriage of Karen Anne ROSE, petitioner, Respondent, v. Brian Keith ROSE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 12, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karen Anne Rose, Wyoming, MN, pro se respondent.

Janet Reiter, Chisago County Attorney, Center City, MN, for respondent County of Chisago.

Mark Nygaard, Nygaard & Longe, St. Paul, MN, for appellant.

Considered and decided by STONEBURNER, Presiding Judge; SHUMAKER, Judge; and PORITSKY, Judge.


OPINION

SHUMAKER, Judge.

A child support magistrate (CSM) denied appellant's motion to modify his child-support obligation, ruling that appellant was not entitled to rely on the amendment of the child-support guidelines, which provides a combined parental income mechanism for determining child support, to show the requisite substantial change in circumstances. The district court affirmed that ruling on review. Because the ruling erroneously deprived appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases