1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 764 N.W.2d
  5. 764 N.W.2d 384 (2009)
 

STROOP v. FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE

No. A08-1320.

764 N.W.2d 384 (2009)

James STROOP, Respondent, v. FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE a/k/a Illinois Farmers Insurance Company, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 21, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wilbur W. Fluegel, Fluegel Law Office, David W.H. Jorstad, McCoy, Peterson & Jorstad, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.

Daniel R. Mitchell, Votel, McEachron & Godfrey, St. Paul, MN, for appellant.

Considered and decided by STONEBURNER, Presiding Judge; SHUMAKER, Judge; and PORITSKY, Judge.

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge.

In Oanes v. Allstate Ins. Co., the supreme court held that a UIM claim accrues and the statute of limitations begins to run "when the UIM claim becomes ripe by settlement or adjudication of the claim against the tortfeasor." 617 N.W.2d 401, 402 (Minn.2000). This appeal raises the legal issue of when a UIM claim is "ripe by settlement." In this case, the district court denied appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases