1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 760 N.W.2d
  5. 760 N.W.2d 342 (2009)
 

KOTTSCHADE v. CITY OF ROCHESTER

No. A08-0143.

760 N.W.2d 342 (2009)

Franklin KOTTSCHADE, Appellant, v. CITY OF ROCHESTER, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

February 10, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy S. Hollister (pro hac vice), Shipman & Goodwin, L.L.P., Hartford, CT; and Gary A. Van Cleve, Rob A. Stefonowicz, Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Bloomington, MN, for appellant.

Clifford M. Greene, Monte A. Mills, Greene Espel, P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.

Richard D. Snyder, Joseph G. Springer, Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for amicus curiae.

Considered and decided by SHUMAKER, Presiding Judge; PETERSON, Judge; and STAUBER, Judge.

OPINION

STAUBER, Judge.

On appeal from the district court's summary judgment that appellant-developer's complaint alleging a regulatory taking by respondent-city was filed beyond the limitations period, appellant argues that (1) under the finality doctrine of Williamson County Reg'l Planning Comm'n v. Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172, 105 S.Ct. 3108, 87 L.Ed.2d 126 (1985), and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases