PAULOWNIA PLANTATIONS DE PANAMA CORP. v. RAJAMANNAN

No. A07-2199.

757 N.W.2d 903 (2008)

PAULOWNIA PLANTATIONS DE PANAMA CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Ambrose Harry RAJAMANNAN, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 9, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William F. Mohrman, Erick G. Kaardal, Tona T. Dove, Mohrman & Kaardal, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.

Gary Hansen, Aaron Mills Scott, Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly, L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN, for respondents.

Considered and decided by STONEBURNER, Presiding Judge; SHUMAKER, Judge; and STAUBER, Judge.


OPINION

STAUBER, Judge.

In this appeal from the district court's dismissal of appellant's claims on the basis of forum non conveniens, appellant argues that the district court erred in granting respondents' motion to dismiss because Panamanian law clearly states that Panama is not an available forum in this case, and respondents presented no evidence to the contrary. Appellant also contends that the public- and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases