GOODMAN v. BEST BUY, INC.

No. A07-1820.

755 N.W.2d 354 (2008)

Jonathon L. GOODMAN, Appellant, v. BEST BUY, INC., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

September 2, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Katherine L. MacKinnon, Law Office of Katherine L. MacKinnon, St. Louis Park, MN, for appellant.

Joseph G. Schmitt, Halleland Lewis Nilan & Johnson, Minneapolis, MN; and Shalanda D. Ballard, Best Buy, Inc., Richfield, MN, for respondent.

Considered and decided by WRIGHT, Presiding Judge; LANSING, Judge; and MINGE, Judge.


OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Three months after the federal district court dismissed, without prejudice, Jonathon Goodman's removed, pendent Minnesota Human Rights Act claim, he refiled this claim in state district court. The state district court concluded that the statute-of-limitations period had expired and that 28 U.S.C. § 1367(d) (2000) allows the plaintiff only thirty days after the dismissal of a removed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases