1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 984 N.W.2d
  5. 984 N.W.2d 71 (2022)
 

TP. v. RICE

Docket No. 163053 Calendar No. 1.

984 N.W.2d 71 (2022)

509 Mich. 363

James TOWNSHIP, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel RICE, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided June 22, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brandt, Gilbert, Thompson & Campbell, Saginaw (by Gary R. Campbell ) for plaintiff.

Outside Legal Counsel PLC, Hemlock (by Philip L. Ellison ) for defendant.

BEFORE THE ENTIRE BENCH.

OPINION

At issue is whether defendant, Daniel Rice, a prevailing farm or farm operation under the Right to Farm Act (RTFA),1 is entitled to costs, expenses, and attorney fees under MCL 286.473b of the act, which provides, in pertinent part, that in a nuisance action, a prevailing farm or farm operation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases