HUNT v. DRIELICK

SC: 157476 COA: 333630 SC: 157477 COA: 333631 SC: 157478 COA: 333632.

956 N.W.2d 514 (2021)

Marie HUNT, Personal Representative of the Estate of Eugene Wayne Hunt, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant/Garnishor-Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Roger DRIELICK, d/b/a Roger Drielick Trucking, Defendant/Counterplaintiff/Cross-Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and Corey A. Drielick, Defendant/Counterplaintiff/Cross-Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and Great Lakes Carriers Corp., Defendant/Cross-Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and Great Lakes Logistics & Services, Inc., and Mermaid Transportation, Inc., Defendants, and Sargent Trucking, Inc., Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Garnishee-Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Brandon James Huber, Plaintiff/Garnishor-Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Corey A. Drielick and Roger Drielick, d/b/a Roger Drielick Trucking, Defendants/Counterplaintiffs/Cross-Plaintiffs/Cross-Defendants-Appellees, and Great Lakes Carriers Corp., Defendant/Cross-Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and Great Lakes Logistics & Services, Inc., and Mermaid Transportation, Inc., Defendants, and Sargent Trucking, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Garnishee-Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Thomas Luczak and Noreen Luczak, Plaintiffs/Garnishor-Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. Corey A. Drielick and Roger Drielick, d/b/a Roger Drielick Trucking, Defendants/Counterplaintiffs/Cross-Plaintiffs/Cross-Defendants-Appellees, and Great Lakes Carriers Corp., Defendant/Cross-Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and Great Lakes Logistics & Services, Inc., and Mermaid Transportation, Inc., Defendants, and Sargent Trucking, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Garnishee-Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

April 9, 2021.


Order

On October 7, 2020, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to appeal, as cross-appellants, the December 14, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the application is again considered. MCR 7.305(H)(1). In lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals correctly held that prejudgment interest on the underlying actions should be calculated from the dates...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases