TINSLEY v. YATOOMA

No. 349354.

964 N.W.2d 45 (2020)

333 Mich. App. 257

Ronald TINSLEY, Van Buren Steel, Inc., and Van Buren Properties of Michigan, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Norman YATOOMA and Norman Yatooma & Associates, PC, Defendants-Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Decided August 13, 2020, 9:10 a.m.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Speaker Law Firm, PLLC (by Jennifer M. Alberts and Liisa R. Speaker , Kalamazoo) for Ronald Tinsley, Van Buren Steel, Inc., and Van Buren Properties of Michigan, LLC.

Norman Yatooma & Associates, PC (by Christine L. Constantino Jr. , Norman A. Yatooma , Bloomfield Hills, and Gavin J. Fleming , Farmington Hills) for Norman Yatooma and Norman Yatooma & Associates, PC.

Before: Markey, P.J., and K. F. Kelly and Tukel, JJ.


Plaintiffs appeal by right the trial court's order granting summary disposition in favor of defendants under MCR 2.116(C)(7) (dismissal appropriate because of agreement to arbitrate). We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs retained defendants to represent them in a malpractice action (the underlying litigation) against plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases