DOES 11-18 v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS

SC: 157729 COA: 332536 SC: 157730 COA: 335440 SC: 157731 COA: 335527.

928 N.W.2d 214 (2019)

John DOES 11-18, Jane Doe 1, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Governor, Former Director Department of Corrections, Former Deputy Director Department of Corrections Facilities Administration, Former Chief Deputy Director Department of Corrections Facilities Administration, Former Warden of Charles Egeler Reception and Guidance Center, Former Warden of Earnest C. Brooks Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Oaks Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Thumb Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Chippewa Correctional Facility, Warden of Kinross Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Newberry Correctional Facility, and Former Warden of Michigan Reformatory Correctional Facility, Defendants-Appellants. John Does 1-10 and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Department of Corrections, Governor, Director Department of Corrections, Former Director Department of Corrections, Deputy Director Department of Corrections Facilities Administration, Former Deputy Director Department of Corrections Facilities Administration, Former Deputy Director Department of Corrections Facilities Administration, Former Chief Deputy Director Department of Corrections Facilities Administration, Warden of Ionia Correctional Facility, Former Warden of E. C. Brooks Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Gus Harrison Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Carson City Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Oaks Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Oaks Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Thumb Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Chippewa Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Marquette Correctional Facility, Warden of Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility, Warden of Kinross Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Newberry Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Women's Huron Valley Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Women's Huron Valley Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Michigan Reformatory, and Warden of Saginaw Correctional Facility, Defendants-Appellants. John Does 1-10 and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Department of Corrections, Governor, Director Department of Corrections, Former Director Department of Corrections, Deputy Director Department of Corrections Facilities Administration, Former Deputy Director Department of Corrections Facilities Administration, Former Deputy Director Department of Corrections Facilities Administration, Former Chief Deputy Director Department of Corrections Facilities Administration, Warden of Ionia Correctional Facility, Former Warden of E. C. Brooks Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Gus Harrison Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Carson City Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Oaks Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Oaks Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Thumb Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Chippewa Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Marquette Correctional Facility, Warden of Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility, Warden of Kinross Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Newberry Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Women's Huron Valley Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Women's Huron Valley Correctional Facility, Former Warden of Michigan Reformatory, and Warden of Saginaw Correctional Facility, Defendants-Appellants.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 14, 2019.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 27, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, there being no majority in favor of granting leave to appeal or taking other action.

I would grant the application in these two consolidated class actions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases