1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 921 N.W.2d
  5. 921 N.W.2d 334 (2019)
 

LAFAVE v. IONIA COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION CHAIRPERSON

SC: 157398 COA: 336004.

921 N.W.2d 334 (2019)

Renee B. LAFAVE, Shirley Zimmer, Ronald J. Proctor, and Joann M. Proctor, Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants-Appellees, v. IONIA COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION CHAIRPERSON, Lawrence R. McCaleb, Ionia County Drain Commissioner, Lyons Township Supervisor, Dawn Konenski, Roger Konenski, Alicia Betz, Medford Bailey, Robert Zimmer, Tracy Anthony, Daniel R. Zimmer, Jodie L. Zimmer, Dawn Aldrich, Patricia M. Lippincott as Trustee of Patricia M. Lippincott Trust, Johanna Parshall, Michelle Droste, Eugene Droste, Director of Department of Natural Resources, Consumer Energy Company, AT&T, Homeworks Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Janet Gamble, Lonnie R. Reynolds, Shelly R. Reynolds, John G. Baker, John J. Harris, Rose M. Manning, and William Thomas, Defendants/Cross-Defendants, and State Treasurer and Leon A. Platte as Trustee of Leon A. Platte Trust, Defendants, and Sally N. Cook, Defendant/Counterplaintiff/Cross-Defendant, and Township of Lyons and Ionia County Road Commission, Third-Party Defendants, and Director of Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Third-Party Defendant, and Molly E. KandLe-Kost and James Kost, Defendants/Counterplaintiffs/Cross-Plaintiffs/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 16, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

JEFFREY P. RAY , for RENEE B. LAFAVE, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee.

NATHAN A. GAMBILL , for STATE TREASURER, Defendant.

PHILIP L. ELLISON , for MOLLY E. KANDLE-KOST, Defendant-Counter Plaintiff Cross-Plaintiff Third-Party Appellant.

NATHAN A. GAMBILL , for DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES/DIRECTOR, Defendant Cross-Defendant.

LISA M. BRUNO-HERLINE , for AT&T, Defendant Cross-Defendant.

NATHAN A. GAMBILL , for DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS/DIRECTOR, Defendant Cross-Defendant Third-Party Defendant.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 1, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases