1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 915 N.W.2d
  5. 915 N.W.2d 383 (2018)
 

HONIGMAN MILLER SCHWARTZ v. CITY OF DETROIT

No. 336175.

915 N.W.2d 383 (2018)

322 Mich.App. 667

HONIGMAN MILLER SCHWARTZ AND COHN LLP, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CITY OF DETROIT, Respondent-Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Decided January 18, 2018, at 9:05 a.m. Leave to appeal sought.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP (by John D. Pirich and Lynn A. Gandhi ) for petitioner.

Charles N. Raimi , Robert E. Forrest , and Sheri Whyte for respondent.

Before: Murphy, P.J., and Sawyer and Beckering, JJ.

We are asked in this case to determine whether services performed by an attorney in Detroit on behalf of a client located outside the city while that attorney is physically located in his or her office in the city — is to be considered in-city or out-of-city income for purpose of § 23 of the City

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases