1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 884 N.W.2d
  5. 884 N.W.2d 292 (2016)
 

HARLEY DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY

Docket Nos. 153594, 153595, 153596, 153597, 153598, 153599, 153600, 153601, 153602, 153603, 153604, 153605, 153606, 153607, 153608. COA Nos. 325498, 326130, 326131, 326135, 327057, 327178, 327217, 327218, 327694, 327964, 327995, 328193, 328206, 328317, 328967.

884 N.W.2d 292 (2016)

HARLEY DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, Defendant-Appellee. L'Oreal USA, Inc. & Subsidiaries, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant-Appellee. L'Oreal USA, Inc. & Subsidiaries, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant-Appellee. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant-Appellee. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant-Appellee. Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant-Appellee. T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Subsidiaries, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant-Appellee. General Aluminum MFG Company, Plaintiff-AppellaNT, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant-Appellee. Johnson Matthey, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant-Appellee. McNeil-PPC, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant-Appellee. Fluor Corp & Subsidiaries, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant-Appellee. DirecTV, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant-Appellee. Solo Cup Operating Corp, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant-Appellee. Conagra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant-Appellee. Boise, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant-Appellee.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 6, 2016.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 15, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I would grant leave to appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases