GURSTEN v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION

Docket No. 152816.

879 N.W.2d 875 (2016)

Steven M. GURSTEN, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 22, 2016.


Order

On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered. Because the Attorney Grievance Commission did not sufficiently communicate the basis for its decision, we DIRECT it to provide a supplemental response, within 28 days of the date of this order, in support of its decision not to initiate formal proceedings in AGC File No. 0935-14. The explanation must reference the ABA Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions and address the allegations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases