WURTZ v. BEECHER METRO DIST.

Docket No. 146157. Calendar No. 9.

848 N.W.2d 121 (2014)

495 Mich. 242

WURTZ v. BEECHER METROPOLITAN DISTRICT.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided April 25, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles A. Grossmann , Flint, for plaintiff.

Landry, Mazzeo & Dembinski, PC, Farmington Hills (by Nancy Vayda Dembinski ), for defendants.

Eardley Law Offices, PC, Cannonsburg (by Eugenie B. Eardley and Nicholas F.X. Gumina ), for the Michigan Association for Justice.


ZAHRA, J.

This case requires the Court to consider the application of Michigan's Whistleblowers' Protection Act (WPA)1 to a contract employee whose contract is not renewed ostensibly because of the employee's whistle blowing activities. A contract employee whose term of employment has expired without being subject to a specific adverse employment action identified in the WPA and who seeks reengagement for a new term of employment occupies...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases