GRANDBERRY-LOVETTE v. GARASCIA

Docket No. 311668.

844 N.W.2d 178 (2014)

303 Mich. App. 566

GRANDBERRY-LOVETTE v. GARASCIA.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Decided January 2, 2014, at 9:15 a.m.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ravid & Associates, PC, Southfield (by Jeffrey S. Hayes and Keith M. Banka ), for plaintiff.

Lupo & Koczkur, PC, Sterling Heights (by Paul S. Koczkur and Kenneth L. Lupo ), for defendant.

Before: JANSEN, P.J., and O'CONNELL and M.J. KELLY, JJ.


M.J. KELLY, J.

In this suit to recover damages resulting from a fall, plaintiff, Charlotte Grandberry-Lovette, appeals by right the trial court's order granting a motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10) by defendant Mark Garascia. We conclude that the trial court erred when it granted Garascia's motion for summary disposition. Specifically, because Garascia failed to establish that there was no genuine factual dispute regarding whether he had constructive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases