AFSCME COUNCIL 25 v. STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT

Docket Nos. 143827, 143828, 143829, 143830. COA Nos. 302959, 302960, 302961, 302962.

805 N.W.2d 835 (2011)

490 Mich. 935

AFSCME COUNCIL 25, Sylvester Austin, Mark Smith, David Baker, Myrtel Brown, Lenore Davis, and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, State Employees' Retirement System Board, Public Employee Retirement Health Care Funding Trust, Department of Technology, Management & Budget, Director of Department of Technology, Management & Budget, Director of the Office of Retirement Services, and State Treasurer, Defendants-Appellants. Michigan State Employees Association, Kenneth Moore, Tim Schutt, Donna Spencer, and Russell Waters, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. State Employees' Retirement System, State Employees' Retirement System Board, Public Employee Retirement Health Care Funding Trust, Department of Technology, Management & Budget, Director of Department of Technology, Management & Budget, Director of the Office of Retirement Services, State Treasurer, and State of Michigan, Defendants-Appellants. Service Employees International Union Local 517M and Service Employees International Union Local 526M, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. State Employees' Retirement System, State Employees' Retirement System Board, Public Employee Retirement Health Care Funding Trust, Department of Technology, Management & Budget, Director of Department of Technology, Management & Budget, Director of the Office of Retirement Services, and State Treasurer, Defendants-Appellants. Anthony McNeill, Rick Hankinson, Ray Holman, Rachael Siemen, all others similarly situated, International Union UAW, and UAW Local 6000, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Public School Employees' Retirement Board, State Employees' Retirement System, State Employees' Retirement System Board, Public Employee Retirement Health Care Funding Trust, Department of Technology, Management & Budget, Director of Department of Technology, Management & Budget, Director of the Office of Retirement Services, and State Treasurer, Defendants-Appellants.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

December 14, 2011.


Order

On order of the Court, the motions for leave to file brief amicus curiae and to file a responsive brief are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the August 25, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases