="lgl-u-1 lgl-u-md-3-5 header-right">
Leagle.com Leagle.com Leagle.com
Sign in
 

KING v. U.S.

No. 12-175.

KING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant.

United States Court of Federal Claims.

December 23, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

JOHNATHAN DANIEL KING, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

DAVID ALLEN, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

DONALD EDWARD ARNOLD, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

ADAM BAIRD, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

CHRISTOPHER PAUL BARKER, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

TRACY T. BEAMS, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

ALEJANDRO CASTANEDA, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

CARL CRAVENS, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

WILLIAM J. DUNLAP, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

JOHN THOMAS EDWARDS, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

ALLEN H. FORAKER, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

ANTHONY GRAHAM, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

MARK A. GARRISON, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

RONALD J. GUIDRY, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

JEREMY D. HEARN, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

CARLOS M. HERNANDEZ, and, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

JESSICA L. HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

ROBERT C. HUDGINS, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

KENNETH JOHNSON, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

JERRY S. JONES, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

RAY T. JONES, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

SCOTT LYNCH, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

THOMAS C. MADRID, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

ERIC A. MAGANA, Plaintiff, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

USA, Defendant, represented by Daniel B. Volk , U.S. Department of Justice - Civil Division.

USA, Counter Claimant, represented by Daniel B. Volk , U.S. Department of Justice - Civil Division.

DAVID ALLEN, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

DONALD EDWARD ARNOLD, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

ADAM BAIRD, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

CHRISTOPHER PAUL BARKER, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

TRACY T. BEAMS, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

ALEJANDRO CASTANEDA, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

CARL CRAVENS, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

WILLIAM J. DUNLAP, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

JOHN THOMAS EDWARDS, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

ALLEN H. FORAKER, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

MARK A. GARRISON, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

ANTHONY GRAHAM, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

RONALD J. GUIDRY, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

JEREMY D. HEARN, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

CARLOS M. HERNANDEZ, and, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

JESSICA L. HERNANDEZ, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

ROBERT C. HUDGINS, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

KENNETH JOHNSON, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

JERRY S. JONES, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

RAY T. JONES, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

JOHNATHAN DANIEL KING, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

SCOTT LYNCH, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

THOMAS C. MADRID, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.

ERIC A. MAGANA, Counter Defendant, represented by Raymond C. Fay , Fay Law Group PLLC.


OPINION ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

NANCY B. FIRESTONE, Judge.

Pending before the court are the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, filed pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC").1 The plaintiffs, current and former employees of United States Customs and Border Protection ("CBP" or "the agency"), brought this suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") of 1938...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases

    DIXON v. HUDSONVILLE TRUC | 803 N.W.2d 350 (2011) | 20110927291 | Leagle.com
     

    DIXON v. HUDSONVILLE TRUCK AND TRAILER SERVICE COMPANY

    Docket No. 143232. COA No. 296948.

    803 N.W.2d 350 (2011)

    Charles DIXON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HUDSONVILLE TRUCK AND TRAILER SERVICE COMPANY, Defendant, and Borculo Garage, d/b/a Grassmid Transport, Defendant-Appellee, and Stoughton Trailers, Inc., and Hendrickson USA, L.L.C., Defendants.

    Supreme Court of Michigan.

    September 26, 2011.


    Order

    On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the May 3, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed...

    Let's get started

    Leagle.com

    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
    Sign on now to see your case.
    Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

    • Updated daily.
    • Uncompromising quality.
    • Complete, Accurate, Current.

    Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

    Cited Cases

    • No Cases Found

    Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

    Citing Cases